May day the revolution begins

Today we begin to ignore the fascist proclamations of current government officials in the USA. These are mostly Democrat party members with a few cowardly Republicans thrown in for flavoring. Stop obeying and loving these shitheads claiming sovereignty over your dumb asses!

Self Education

copy this, then delete this entry

https://getpocket.com/explore/item/how-to-get-a-world-class-education-for-free-on-the-internet?utm_source=pocket-newtab

Changes are coming after so long a time...

Quick note here that I hope to finally set up my own domain and start hosting this and other blogs elsewhere. If perchance a publisher should agree to buy something I've written in future days, I don't want the google empire confiscating my work because I had it posted here in their space.

I will likely leave this blog "up" with a pointer to my domain address (forthcoming...) Personal background may get dumped...

Also, now that I have forsworn fake-book-like social media and ephemera monitoring*, I should have time to make more frequent posts to The Traveller.

Stay tuned oh audience of -1,000,000....














*Note that I let myself get caught up in the social media of my day for the original purpose of warning all my friends and loved ones away from the idolatries of our age. I found myself in error and was eager to encourage my loved ones toward enlightenment (I plead with anyone who would listen day and night for twelve plus years)--this is not a good idea, since most people gain awareness each at individual rates, one must instead learn to be patient and less confrontational about evil in the world. I live in a time when the masses just ignore injustice unless it directly affects themselves personally, so their wink at evil makes trying to repent of it difficult. One should just work on oneself, pray, and if one is around when or if the others awaken, one can rejoice exceedingly. Until that day, may God give us grace to follow wisdom and grow our character and be patient with those who do not want TRUTH.

Wolfgang Smith---pending

Of late, and especially because of my monthly philosophy group meetings, I have been delving into Wolfgang Smith's writings. I started with his last major book, "The Wisdom of Ancient Cosmology: Contemporary Science in Light of Tradition," and am now working on his, "Science and Myth (With Response to Stephen Hawking)," which is really a chapterized collection of excellent essays concerning different aspects of perennial philosophy and it's impact on knowledge and scientific enterprise.

There is great writing throughout "Science & Myth," and I'd love to quote the entire book, so get a copy and read it for yourself if you have the slightest interest in philosophy. Today's reading of chapter three brought forth to my mind these lovely mind tickling passages (the first is from pp60-61; the second from pp62-65):

"     Getting back to "scientism" in the first sense--the reification, namely, of the physical universe--let us now ask ourselves how this self-contradictory world-view could have imposed itself upon a major portion of mankind. One might think that the operational validity of physics--the fact that "it works" and gives rise to a miraculous technology--leaves us no choice; but whereas this may be partly true in the case of the uninformed, it can hardly be so when it comes to scientists of first rank. To recognize what ultimately stands at issue, we need to remind ourselves that man was made, not to play positivistic games, but to know truth, to know being. It is no more possible for him to renounce the being of things than it is to stop breathing; his hunger for being--and indeed, for Being itself, which is God!--is relentless, and cannot finally be appeased by anything less. And so it comes about that when being has been excluded from his purview by an act of epitemic closure, the scientist himself feels compelled to bring it back, to reinstate it somehow in his universe. Admittedly it is possible to obviate the reification of the physical, as we have noted: but only at the cost of locating being in some other domain. It is safe to say that for all but the most wise or the ultra-sophisticated, it will be the physical-concept universe that is reified, and the few who manage to avoid this pitfall will likely succumb to some alternative mode of scientism. There is in fact only one way to obviate scientistic illusion, and that is the way of authentic philosophy: one needs to see the whole picture--the epistemic circle plus the unlimited speculative field within which it is drawn--in order not to be deceived. The moment, therefore, that a science loses contact with what Borella terms "the general science which is philosophy"--in that very instant the birth of illusion is bound to take place. Something alien and indeed contradictory to science is unwittingly smuggled in, and thenceforth masquerades in scientific garb: thus does science of the post-Galilean kind beget scientism. The die has been cast in a radical act of epistemic closure, which cuts the human individual off from true being, or subjectively speaking, from his own true ground and "higher" subconscious.17"

{17. This does not mean that the scientist makes no use of this "subconscious" in the exercise of his scientific functions; as we have noted before, he does, most assuredly, make use of it. My point, rather, is that in the name of epistemic closure the existence and rightful function of that faculty is implicitly denied.}

"[]"












]

THE ULUBURUN SHIP

Current thinking suggests that the Uluburun ship may have begun its journey in either Egypt or Canaan (perhaps at Abu Hawam in what is now modern-day Israel), and made stops at Ugarit in northern Syria and possibly at a port on Cyprus. It then headed west into the Aegean, following the southern coastline of Anatolia (modern Turkey). Along the way, the crew of the vessel had taken on board raw glass, storage jars full of barley, resin, spices, and perhaps wine, and— most precious of all— nearly a ton of raw tin and ten tons of raw copper, which were to be mixed together to form that most wondrous of metals, bronze.

From the ship’s cargo, we are reasonably certain that it was traveling westward from the Levant, apparently bound for a port city in the Aegean— perhaps one of the two or three on the Greek mainland that served the capital center of Mycenae, or maybe one of the other major cities, such as Pylos on the mainland or Kommos or even Knossos on Crete. The mere fact that there was another ship sailing from east to west during the Late Bronze Age was enough to confirm Bass’s theories and completely alter modern scholars’ thoughts about the extent of trade and contacts that took place more than three thousand years ago. Three Bronze Age ships have now been found, but the wreck at Uluburun is the largest, wealthiest, and most completely excavated.

The owner and sponsors of the ship are still unknown. One can speculate about different possibilities to explain the origins of the vessel and the location of its final resting place. It may have been a commercial venture, sent by Near Eastern or Egyptian merchants, perhaps with the blessing of an Egyptian pharaoh or Canaanite king. Or it may have been sent directly by a pharaoh or king, as a greeting-gift from one sovereign to another, as was frequently done during the Amarna Age a few decades earlier. Perhaps the ship was sent by the Mycenaeans on a “shopping expedition” to the Eastern Mediterranean and sank on the return voyage. The merchants on board might have acquired the raw materials and other goods not available in Greece itself, such as the tin and copper, as well as the ton of terebinth resin (from pistachio trees) that could be used in the perfume manufactured at Pylos on mainland Greece and then shipped back to Egypt and the Eastern Mediterranean. There is obviously no shortage of possible scenarios. If the Mycenaeans were the intended recipients, then they might have been waiting impatiently for the cargo on the ship, for it contained enough raw metal to outfit an army of three hundred men with bronze swords, shields, helmets, and armor, in addition to precious ivory and other exotic items. Clearly, when the boat sank that day in approximately 1300 BC, someone or some kingdom lost a fortune.

The Uluburun ship sank in fairly deep water— its stern is currently 140 feet below the surface, with the rest of the ship at an angle sloping even farther down, to 170 feet below the surface. Diving to the depth of 140– 70 feet is dangerous, for it is beyond the limit of safe scuba diving. The INA divers were allowed only two dives per day, twenty minutes each time. In addition, at those depths, increased levels of inhaled gases can cause a narcotic effect. Working that deep, Bass said, felt as though they had had two martinis before starting— so every dive and every movement to be made underwater had to be planned out in advance.

Over the course of nearly a dozen seasons, from 1984 to 1994, the team dove on the wreck more than twenty-two thousand times without a single major injury, testament to their precautions and the fact that their dives were overseen by an ex– Navy SEAL. The end result was a plan of the ancient wreck and its cargo that is as accurate, down to the millimeter, as any made at a land excavation, despite the great depths at which they were working. The dives also resulted in the retrieval of thousands of objects, which are still being studied.

The boat itself was originally about fifty feet long. It was well constructed, with planks and keel made from Lebanese cedar and using a mortise-and-tenon design for the hull. Previously, the earliest-known wreck in the Mediterranean to use this mortise-and-tenon technique was the Kyrenia wreck found off the coast of Cyprus, dating more than a thousand years later, to about 300 BC.

The copper ingots, of which there were more than 350, were especially difficult to excavate and bring to the surface. During the three thousand years that they had lain underwater, stacked herringbone fashion in four separate rows, many of them had significantly disintegrated and were now in an extremely fragile state. Eventually, a new type of glue had to be used by the archaeological conservators working on Bass’s team: an adhesive that could be injected into the remains of an ingot, and which would congeal and harden underwater over the course of a year. The glue would eventually bond together the disparate parts of a decomposed ingot well enough so that it could be hauled to the surface.

But there was far more on board the ship than just the copper ingots. It turned out that the cargo carried in the Uluburun ship consisted of an incredible assortment of goods, truly an international manifest. In all, products from at least seven different countries, states, and empires were on board the ship. In addition to its primary cargo of ten tons of Cypriot copper, one ton of tin, and a ton of terebinth resin, there were also two dozen ebony logs from Nubia; almost two hundred ingots of raw glass from Mesopotamia, most colored dark blue, but others of light blue, purple, and even a shade of honey/ amber; about 140 Canaanite storage jars in two or three basic sizes, which contained the terebinth resin, remains of grapes, pomegranates, and figs, as well as spices like coriander and sumac; brand-new pottery from Cyprus and Canaan, including oil lamps, bowls, jugs, and jars; scarabs from Egypt and cylinder seals from elsewhere in the Near East; swords and daggers from Italy and Greece (some of which might have belonged to crew members or passengers), including one with an inlaid hilt of ebony and ivory; and even a stone scepter-mace from the Balkans. There was also gold jewelry, including pendants, and a gold chalice; duck-shaped ivory cosmetic containers; copper, bronze, and tin bowls and other vessels; twenty-four stone anchors; fourteen pieces of hippopotamus ivory and one elephant tusk; and a six-inch-tall statue of a Canaanite deity made of bronze overlaid with gold in places— which, if it was supposed to serve as the protective deity for the ship, didn’t do its job very well.

The tin probably came from the Badakhshan region of Afghanistan, one of the few places where it was available during the second millennium BC. The lapis lazuli on board came from the same area, traveling thousands of miles overland before being brought onto the ship. Many of the pieces, such as the lapis lazuli cylinder seals, were tiny and easy to miss during the excavations, especially when the huge vacuum tubes were used to remove the sand that covered the remains. The fact that they were recovered at all is a testament to the skill of the underwater archaeologists excavating the wreck, led first by Bass and then by his chosen successor, Cemal Pulak.

One of the smallest objects found on board the ship was also one of the most important— an Egyptian scarab made of solid gold. Rare as such an object might be, it was made even more unusual by the hieroglyphs inscribed upon it, for they spelled out the name of Nefertiti, wife of the heretic pharaoh Akhenaten. Her name is written on the scarab as “Nefer-neferu-aten”; it is a spelling that Nefertiti used only during the first five years of her reign, at a time when her husband may have been at the height of his heretical condemnation of every Egyptian deity except Aten, the disk of the sun, whom he— and he alone alone— was allowed to worship directly. 6 The archaeologists used the scarab to help date the ship, for it could not have been made— and therefore the ship could not have sailed— before Nefertiti came to power about 1350 BC.

The archaeologists were able to date the sinking of the ship in three other ways as well. One method involved radiocarbon dating the short-lived twigs and branches that once were used on the deck of the ship. Another involved dendrochronology (counting of tree rings), making use of the wooden beams that made up the hull. The third was the well-used Mycenaean and Minoan pottery that was found on board, which appeared to the specialists to date toward the end of the fourteenth century BC. The four independent dating mechanisms together point to approximately 1300 BC— the very beginning of the thirteenth century BC, give or take a few years in either direction— as the year when the ship went down.

Fragments from a small wooden tablet, originally with ivory hinges, were found on the ship, preserved within a storage jar into which it might have floated while the ship was sinking. Reminiscent of Homer’s “tablet with baneful signs” (Il. 6.178), it is older by more than five hundred years than similar writing boards that had been found at Nimrud in Iraq. The tablet might once have contained a record of the ship’s itinerary, or perhaps the cargo manifest. However, the wax on which the writing was inscribed within the two sides of the tablet vanished long ago, leaving no sign of what had been recorded. It is therefore still impossible to tell whether the cargo on board was meant as a royal gift, perhaps from the king of Egypt to the king at Mycenae, or whether it belonged to a private merchant, selling goods at the principal ports around the Mediterranean. As hypothesized previously, it also could be purchases made on a long-distance shopping trip, for the raw materials on board matched what was needed by the workmen and craft shops of Mycenaean palaces such as Pylos in order to make high-demand concoctions, including perfumes and oils, as well as jewelry such as glass necklaces.

We may never know who sent the Uluburun ship on its voyage or where it was going and why, but it is clear that the ship contained a microcosm of the international trade and contacts that were ongoing in the Eastern Mediterranean, and across the Aegean, during the early thirteenth century BC. Not only were there goods from at least seven different areas, but— judging from the personal possessions the archaeologists found in the shipwreck— there were also at least two Mycenaeans on board, even though this seems to have been a Canaanite ship. Clearly this ship does not belong to a world of isolated civilizations, kingdoms, and fiefdoms, but rather to an interconnected world of trade, migration, diplomacy, and, alas, war. This really was the first truly global age.



Cline, Eric H. (2014-03-23). 1177 B.C.: The Year Civilization Collapsed: The Year Civilization Collapsed (Turning Points in Ancient History) (p. 74-79). Princeton University Press. Kindle Edition.

Here is the wikipedia article also:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uluburun_shipwreck